Sat. March 18 — National March on Washington

On the 20th anniversary of the US invasion of Iraq

No War in Ukraine! No to NATO! No Weapons, No Money for the Ukraine War

More than 200 antiwar and anti-imperialist organizations are supporting a national march in Washington, DC on the 20th anniversary of the invasion of Iraq.

The plan:

We will rally at the White House (Lafayette Square) at 1:00 pm on Saturday, March 18. Then we will march and finish with an indoor event at the New York Presbyterian Church at 13th Street and New York Avenue, NW.

There will also be local actions that weekend across the country.

This action is being organized by a coalition of groups that are dedicated to building an antiwar movement rooted in working class and poor communities. The danger of global war is growing! The people must act!

Strugglelalucha256


The Havana Syndrome case cracked

Even before the attack on the homeland of the weather balloons, the Havana Syndrome tested America’s mettle.

The Havana Syndrome was first reported in Cuba in 2016. The mysterious malady initially afflicted U.S. embassy staff in Havana, especially those attached to intelligence missions. It then spread to Canadian embassy officials. The sudden headaches, debilitating dizziness, and hearing excruciatingly painful sounds struck both at work and at home. Oddly, the Cubans themselves appeared immune to the pathology.

Soon other cases of what the U.S. Defense Department called “anomalous health incidents” (AHIs) were reported in Russia, China, Colombia, Uzbekistan, and then even in the U.S.. This mass psychogenic illness was experienced mostly by U.S. government spies, diplomats, and military personnel all over the world, according to Wikipedia. A “government-wide response” was precipitated with “support groups” established.

The U.S. State Department announced that it considered attention to the Havana Syndrome “an absolute priority.” Secretary of State Antony Blinken believed “there’s nothing we take more seriously.”

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) concluded in a December 2020 report that the most likely probable cause of the AHIs was pulsed microwave energy.

Inferring blame to Cuba and Russia for the “sonic attacks”

White House chief of staff John Kelly commented: “We believe that the Cuban government could stop the attacks on our diplomats.” In September 2017, non-emergency U.S. embassy personnel and family members were evacuated from Cuba.

President Trump blamed the Cubans and, in retaliation for the alleged attacks, expelled most of their embassy staff from Washington. His Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, said the expulsions were “made due to Cuba’s failure to take appropriate steps to protect our diplomats.”

The Cubans, who had no incentive to provoke their powerful neighbor, denied any culpability. They offered to fully cooperate with U.S. authorities in their investigation of the syndrome.

The Cubans deployed 2,000 scientists and law enforcement officials in their investigation, which was hampered by the refusal by the U.S. government to share medical information on those supposedly afflicted by the Havana Syndrome. Access to residences in Cuba that were purportedly targeted by the “sonic attacks” was also blocked.

But the Yankees had bigger fish to fry. Could the evil foreign adversary beaming the invisible energy waves be none other than the one blamed for stealing Hillary Clinton’s election victory? The so-called “free press,” exemplified by this message from CNN, incessantly reminded us regarding the Havana Syndrome: “The list of known, and suspected, aggressions Russia has carried out against U.S. democracy and American personnel is vast.”

In May 2021, Politico breathlessly reported that unnamed U.S. government officials believe “a notorious Russian spy agency [GRU] may be behind alleged attacks.” “It looks, smells and feels like” the Russians, according to an anonymous “former national security official involved in the investigation.” What more conclusive evidence could one possibly want?

The New Yorker, meanwhile, warned the Havana Syndrome had spread to the White House. “Top officials in both the Trump and the Biden Administrations,” they reported, “privately suspect that Russia is responsible for the Havana Syndrome.”

CIA chief William Burns called the incidents “attacks.” When the bipartisan HAVANA (Helping American Victims Afflicted by Neurological Attacks) ACT of 2021 unanimously passed, the incidents were officially designated as “attacks.”

CNN reported on the act: “Its signing comes as cases continue to rise worldwide,” floating the theory that “Russia is behind” these attacks. In September 2021, the CIA even recalled one of its station chiefs for expressing “skepticism” about the veracity of the “attacks.”

Mysterious sounds associated with the Havana Syndrome

Top State and CIA officials who had gone to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and the National Institutes of Health with the Havana Syndrome complained that the doctors treated them as if they were “crazy.”

Recordings of sounds associated with the Havana Syndrome were publicly released after the noise analysis by the U.S. Navy could not “significantly advance U.S. knowledge about what is harming diplomats.”

Former MIT researcher and sound expert Joe Pompei told NBC News that the reported sound waves could not cause the alleged symptoms.  “Unless they had transducers in the bathtub and had the diplomats submerge their heads for a long time, it’s just not possible.”

Biologists Alexander Stubbs at UC Berkeley and Fernando Montealegre-Z at the University of Lincoln scientifically analyzed the recordings, which they identified as the song of a cricket (Anurogryllus celerinictus). Even The New York Times, reporting on the scientific findings, admitted: “the sounds linked to the initial complaints may have been a red herring.”

An earlier panel of Cuban scientists similarly concluded that stressful conditions, not a “sonic weapon,” sickened the Yankees. They, too, identified crickets as a possible source of the mysterious noises.

Case cracked: cognitive impairment is an occupational hazard for U.S. cold warriors

A little over a year ago, in January 2022, an interim assessment by the CIA suggested that the Havana Syndrome was NOT a product of “a sustained global campaign by a hostile power.” Stress, environmental conditions, and cognitive impairment were the more likely culprits in the 1000 cases investigated with “analytic rigor, sound tradecraft, and compassion,” in the words of CIA Director William Burns.

However, the interim investigation continued. Finally this month, all seven U.S. intelligence agencies found “available intelligence consistently points against the involvement of U.S. adversaries in causing the reported incidents.”

Still, anti-Cuba zealots did not accept this explanation for the selective pandemic. Senator Marco Rubio rejected the intelligence community’s assessment,  tweeting, “it’s hard to accept…it didn’t happen.”

U.S.’s Cuba policy

Cuba may have been exonerated for the Havana Syndrome, but the socialist country is still targeted by the empire for regime change. The 61-year-old asphyxiating U.S. blockade continues, which puts Washington at odds with the 185 countries that voted in the UN against the unilateral coercive measures, with only Uncle Sam and apartheid Israel voting in favor.

In a parting gesture of ill will, Trump re-designated Cuba as a “State Sponsor of Terrorism” eight days before he left the presidency. Obama had rescinded the designation in 2015, originally imposed in 1982 by Reagan.

In 2021, Biden renewed Trump’s designation, ironically citing Cuba’s efforts to broker a peace in Colombia between the government and a guerilla insurgency. Biden backtracked on his campaign promises to reverse Trump’s harsh sanctions against Cuba and return to a process of normalization of relations.

Inclusion on the terrorist list bars Cuba from access to most international finance. “The real purpose of slandering Cuba as ‘terrorist’ is to justify the criminal blockade on Cuba,” according to the National Network on Cuba (NNOC).

Among the grassroots organizations working to get Cuba off the terrorist list are ACER (https://acere.org/) and the NNOC (https://nnoc.org/). The latter observes: “Despite the devastating impacts of the U.S. economic blockade, Cuba still has a longer life expectancy, lower infant and maternal mortality rates, better health outcomes, higher literacy, more education, and less violence than in the U.S..”

The Havana Syndrome used to falsely accuse Cuba of attacking U.S. personnel exemplifies how distorted U.S. policy is. Like drug peddlers hooked on their own supply, the spooks and kooks who populate the U.S. governmental apparatus suffered literal physical damage believing the paranoic false propaganda that they push on the populace to justify the empire’s forever wars and brutal regime-change intrigues.

Roger D. Harris is with the human rights group Task Force on the Americas, founded in 1985.

Source: Resumen

Strugglelalucha256


Baltimore: Food Is A Right protest – Rollback prices, expand food stamps, end food deserts

MONDAY, APRIL 3, 2023 AT 5:00 PM – 6:30 PM EDT
Protest Food Is A Right – Rollback prices, expand food stamps, end food deserts
Baltimore City Hall, 100 Holliday Street

We are in a food crisis, both in Baltimore City & Maryland. From outrageous food prices, food stamp cuts, to food deserts. We are calling for response from local and national officials.

 

Strugglelalucha256


National Day of Action Against Police Terror – #StopCopCity, March 9

DEMAND JUSTICE

Calling all organizations, organizers, students and community members to join the call for a National Day of Action on March 9th to demand justice for the police murder of Tyrie Nichols in Memphis, #stopcopcity Forest Defender Tortuguita, and all others lost and impacted by police violence and terror.

www.nationaldayofaction.info

Planned Actions

Atlanta

6:00PM

Rally & March-
King Center Amphitheater
449 Auburn Ave NE

Boston

12:15PM

Rally & March-Harvard Square T station

Boston

TBA

Virtual Teach-In

Carbondale Committee to Stop Cop City

Carbondale, IL

6:00PM

Teach-In & March

Davies Gym

Chicago

6:00PM

6:30PM Dinner
7:00PM Teach-In
7:30PM Letter WritingDallas

6:30PM

Candle Light Vigil-3700 Dixon Ave

Detroit

6:30PM

Lunch Counter Livestream

D.C.

6:00PM

Teach-In-March 9th & Banner Drop-March 10th 3PM

Greensboro, NC

2:00PM

Virtual Teach-In

March 11th-Greenwood Library

Mapinduzi

Greenville, NC

TBA

Banner Drop

Jackson, MS

6:00PM

Teach-In-939 W. Capitol St

Memphis

8:00AM

Banner Drop-March 4th

National

7:00PM

Black Alliance for Peace Virtual Panel Discussion

NYC

4:00PM

Rally, March, Direct Action-St. Patricks Cathedral (E 50th St & 5th Ave)

Pittsburgh, PA

12:00PM

Lunch n Learn-Live on Facebook

Philly

7:00AM

Banner Drop “END POLICE TERROR, HERE AND ABROAD – BLACK ALLIANCE FOR PEACE” in black, red and green paint

North American Climate, Conservation and Environment(NACCE)

Roosevelt, NY

TBA

Rally, March, Direct Action-location TBA

San Diego

5:00PM

Panel Discussion-Centro Cultural De La Raza

Vermont

4:00PM

March-Burlington Calahan Park @Charlotte St.

Organization Endorsements

BAP-Baltimore
Ikiya Collective-Honolulu
Oil & Gas Action Network
Lake Hill Townhomes Association-Steger, IL
Movement Strategy Center-Oakland
Carbondale Committee to Stop Cop City-Carbondale, IL
Greensboro People’s Freedom Assembly-NC
Malcolm X Center for Human Rights-Greenville, NC
National Lawyers Guild-National
Rising Majority-National
Pooja Gehi-Communty Member NYC
Laura Hayes-Community Member Fort Pierce, FL
DL Robinson-Community Member
Dr. Karla’s Healthy Living-Community Member Baden, PA
Terra Advocati-Community Member San Antonio, TX
Lazarian & Maksoudian Inc-San Dimas, CA
SAFE Coalition-Charlotte, NC
Food Chain Workers Alliance-Los Angeles, CA

Campaign Endorsement

Please email all logo and flyer subissions to endorse@nationaldayofaction.info

 

Strugglelalucha256


Struggle ★ La Lucha PDF – March 6, 2023

Get PDF here

  • Capitalist greed fuels toxic nightmare
  • COP CITY: Racist police terror continues in Atlanta
  • Stop food stamp cuts!
  • How Black workers made the United States rich
  • ‘Azov’ fascist units in Ukrainian National Guard and Army are being expanded
  • Anniversary of Russian Special Military Operation: A victory for Russia will be a victory for the international working class!
  • Condemn Biden’s report, false designation of Cuba as ‘state sponsor of terrorism’
  • Airbnb desplaza Boricuas
  • La dirigente cubana Mariela Castro Espín habla de la ‘conquista progresiva de nuevos derechos’
Strugglelalucha256


New York City: Rally commemorating Hugo Chavez + Hands off Venezuela, March 5

SUNDAY, MARCH 5, 2023, AT 4:00 PM EST
Rally commemorating Comandante Hugo Chávez + U.S. Hands off Venezuela + FREE Alex Saab !
Simon Bolivar Statue

Rally commemorating the leader of the Bolivarian revolution Comandante Hugo Chávez who transitioned 10 years ago on March 5, 2013

Our demands:
* U.S. Hands OFF Venezuela!
* NO Sanctions on the Venezuelan people!
* FREE kidnapped Venezuelan diplomat, Alex Saab !

Sunday, March 5th @ 4:00pm
Simón Bolívar Statue, Central Park W 59th & 6th Ave
Take N/Q/R/W/F trains to 57 St.

Organized by Troika Kollective, Free Alex Saab Coalition NYC, El D19: Libre, USA-Canada y Costa Rica, PetroBronx Collective, El Frente Internacionalista de Mujeres para la Paz y Justicia, Peruan@s Antifascistas en el Exterior USA, MORENA NY, Alianza Pais RD, Defend Democracy in Brazil, NY-NJ Cuba Si Coalition, Struggle for Socialism/ La Lucha por el Socialismo, El Ministerio de Solidaridad con los Pueblos, Al-Awda NY, the Palestine Right to Return Coalition, Voices of Resistance WBAI, Friends of the ATC, International Action Center & Workers World Party

Strugglelalucha256


Baltimore: Evening of Solidarity with Cuba, March 25

SATURDAY, MARCH 25, 2023 AT 6:00 PM – 9:00 PM EDT
Evening of Solidarity with Cuba – Dinner, Guest Speaker & Music
NoMüNoMü, 709 N. Howard Street, Baltimore

Join us for a Night of Solidarity with Cuba including dinner, music and special guest speaker, Cuban Embassy, Second Secretary, David Ramirez Alvarez. Meet youth and community activists who will travel to Cuba.

Delicious Cuban inspired dinner: Cuban style shrimp & grits, Black beans and rice, roasted turkey & ham, desert & much more.

Tickets for dinner are $10 to $25. No one turned away for lack of funds. Funds raised will help with scholarships for local activists planning to go to Cuba.

Sponsored by: Peoples Power Assembly, Women In Struggle/Mujeres En Lucha (a member of the FDIM), Friends of Latin America, and Struggle-La Lucha

Strugglelalucha256


National Network on Cuba condemns Biden’s report & false designation of Cuba as a ‘state sponsor of terrorism’

February 28, 2023

There is no mistake about it. With the February 27 release of the State Department Country Report on Terrorism 2021, President Biden accepted ownership of the illegal U.S. economic war on Cuba, following suit with Donald Trump, George Bush, and Ronald Reagan’s hawkishness with the false designation of Cuba as a so-called “State Sponsor of Terror.”

Unbelievably Biden’s Secretary of State asserts that “Cuba had repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism since its State Sponsor of Terrorism designation had been rescinded in 2015.” Despite this untrue report, Pres. Biden need only review the past six months and accept Cuba’s unequivocal rejection of terrorism to take Cuba off the list.

The real purpose of slandering Cuba as “terrorist” is to justify the criminal blockade on Cuba. Biden is choosing to join his predecessors in failure – failure to defeat the Cuban people’s centuries-long determination for sovereignty and self-determination on the road to equality, full human development and socialism.

The Country Report on Terrorism repeats the same discredited excuses that over 180 of the world’s countries have rejected for 30 consecutive years in votes at the United Nations General Assembly. The U.S. war on Cuba is increasingly rejected by the U.S. public, whose elected officials in government and unions — representing over 44 million U.S. people — have called for Cuba to be removed from the State Sponsors of Terrorism (SSOT) list and that the U.S. end the blockade and take steps to normalize relations with its much smaller neighbor.

With Cuba’s SSOT designation, the U.S. attempts to criminalize normalizing relations with Cuba, exacerbating the already devastating impacts of the US blockade on Cuba. It makes it harder for Cuba to make international transactions or borrow loans for building infrastructure and buying essential food and medicine. The SSOT designation also punishes people from 40 non-U.S. countries for traveling to Cuba by threatening their eligibility for the U.S. visa waiver program.

During his presidential campaign, Biden said he would reverse Trump’s harsher sanctions and revert to the Obama administration’s policies of normalization, but he has failed to deliver. President Ronald Reagan put Cuba on the list in 1982 because of Cuba’s support for anti-colonial liberation movements around the world and because Cuba gave asylum to political prisoners who escaped persecution by the U.S. government. President Barack Obama removed Cuba from the SSOT List and began to normalize relations with Cuba. Trump added 240 additional harsh sanctions on Cuba and, at the very end of his term, re-designated Cuba as a State Sponsor of Terrorism on January 11, 2021, just days after the fascist insurrection at the Capitol. Biden is continuing the long history of U.S. terror towards Cuba, which includes the Bay of Pigs invasion, funding Cuban exiles to bomb Cuban planes and hotels, and attempting to assassinate Fidel Castro 638 times.

We have seen the results of Biden’s ‘freedom, democracy and human rights’ in his administration’s record number of deportations, COVID deaths, and police killings; in crumbling U.S. infrastructure; in the economic crisis of the American working class; in the never-ending violence and mass-shootings fueled by white supremacy; and in his imperialist policy toward Cuba and the entire Global South.

Despite the devastating impacts of the U.S. economic blockade, Cuba still has a longer life expectancy, lower infant and maternal mortality rates, better health outcomes, higher literacy, more education, and less violence than in the U.S. We support the right of the Cuban people to determine their own path, free from coercive economic measures and U.S. taxpayer-funded destabilization. We support the right of the entire Latin America and the Caribbean to a Zone of Peace, free from the Monroe Doctrine of U.S. intervention and economic exploitation.

We call on justice and freedom-loving people to join us at the White House on Sunday, June 25, to demand Biden take Cuba #OFFTheList and end U.S. terror on Cuba. Biden, write the letter. Take Cuba #OFFtheList and end the blockade. Let Cuba Live.

Source: National Network on  Cuba

Strugglelalucha256


China’s Foreign Ministry on U.S. hegemony and its perils

From the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China.

U.S. Hegemony and Its Perils

February 2023

Contents

Introduction

I. Political Hegemony — Throwing Its Weight Around

II. Military Hegemony — Wanton Use of Force

III. Economic Hegemony — Looting and Exploitation

IV. Technological Hegemony — Monopoly and Suppression

V. Cultural Hegemony — Spreading False Narratives

Conclusion


Introduction

Since becoming the world’s most powerful country after the two world wars and the Cold War, the United States has acted more boldly to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries, pursue, maintain and abuse hegemony, advance subversion and infiltration, and willfully wage wars, bringing harm to the international community.

The United States has developed a hegemonic playbook to stage “color revolutions,” instigate regional disputes, and even directly launch wars under the guise of promoting democracy, freedom and human rights. Clinging to the Cold War mentality, the United States has ramped up bloc politics and stoked conflict and confrontation. It has overstretched the concept of national security, abused export controls and forced unilateral sanctions upon others. It has taken a selective approach to international law and rules, utilizing or discarding them as it sees fit, and has sought to impose rules that serve its own interests in the name of upholding a “rules-based international order.”

This report, by presenting the relevant facts, seeks to expose the U.S. abuse of hegemony in the political, military, economic, financial, technological and cultural fields, and to draw greater international attention to the perils of the U.S. practices to world peace and stability and the well-being of all peoples.

I. Political Hegemony — Throwing Its Weight Around

The United States has long been attempting to mold other countries and the world order with its own values and political system in the name of promoting democracy and human rights.

◆ Instances of U.S. interference in other countries’ internal affairs abound. In the name of “promoting democracy,” the United States practiced a “Neo-Monroe Doctrine” in Latin America, instigated “color revolutions” in Eurasia, and orchestrated the “Arab Spring” in West Asia and North Africa, bringing chaos and disaster to many countries.

In 1823, the United States announced the Monroe Doctrine. While touting an “America for the Americans,” what it truly wanted was an “America for the United States.”

Since then, the policies of successive U.S. governments toward Latin America and the Caribbean Region have been riddled with political interference, military intervention and regime subversion. From its 61-year hostility toward and blockade of Cuba to its overthrow of the Allende government of Chile, U.S. policy on this region has been built on one maxim-those who submit will prosper; those who resist shall perish.

The year 2003 marked the beginning of a succession of “color revolutions” — the “Rose Revolution” in Georgia, the “Orange Revolution” in Ukraine and the “Tulip Revolution” in Kyrgyzstan. The U.S. Department of State openly admitted playing a “central role” in these “regime changes.” The United States also interfered in the internal affairs of the Philippines, ousting President Ferdinand Marcos Sr. in 1986 and President Joseph Estrada in 2001 through the so-called “People Power Revolutions.”

In January 2023, former U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo released his new book “Never Give an Inch: Fighting for the America I Love.” He revealed in it that the United States had plotted to intervene in Venezuela. The plan was to force the Maduro government to reach an agreement with the opposition, deprive Venezuela of its ability to sell oil and gold for foreign exchange, exert high pressure on its economy, and influence the 2018 presidential election.

◆ The U.S. exercises double standards on international rules. Placing its self-interest first, the United States has walked away from international treaties and organizations, and put its domestic law above international law. In April 2017, the Trump administration announced that it would cut off all U.S. funding to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) with the excuse that the organization “supports, or participates in the management of a programme of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.” The United States quit UNESCO twice in 1984 and 2017. In 2017, it announced leaving the Paris Agreement on climate change. In 2018, it announced its exit from the UN Human Rights Council, citing the organization’s “bias” against Israel and failure to protect human rights effectively. In 2019, the United States announced its withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty to seek unfettered development of advanced weapons. In 2020, it announced pulling out of the Treaty on Open Skies.

The United States has also been a stumbling block to biological arms control by opposing negotiations on a verification protocol for the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) and impeding international verification of countries’ activities relating to biological weapons. As the only country in possession of a chemical weapons stockpile, the United States has repeatedly delayed the destruction of chemical weapons and remained reluctant in fulfilling its obligations. It has become the biggest obstacle to realizing “a world free of chemical weapons.”

◆ The United States is piecing together small blocs through its alliance system. It has been forcing an “Indo-Pacific Strategy” onto the Asia-Pacific region, assembling exclusive clubs like the Five Eyes, the Quad and AUKUS, and forcing regional countries to take sides. Such practices are essentially meant to create division in the region, stoke confrontation and undermine peace.

◆ The U.S. arbitrarily passes judgment on democracy in other countries, and fabricates a false narrative of “democracy versus authoritarianism” to incite estrangement, division, rivalry and confrontation. In December 2021, the United States hosted the first “Summit for Democracy,” which drew criticism and opposition from many countries for making a mockery of the spirit of democracy and dividing the world. In March 2023, the United States will host another “Summit for Democracy,” which remains unwelcome and will again find no support.

II. Military Hegemony — Wanton Use of Force

The history of the United States is characterized by violence and expansion. Since it gained independence in 1776, the United States has constantly sought expansion by force: it slaughtered Indians, invaded Canada, waged a war against Mexico, instigated the American-Spanish War, and annexed Hawaii. After World War II, the wars either provoked or launched by the United States included the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the Kosovo War, the War in Afghanistan, the Iraq War, the Libyan War and the Syrian War, abusing its military hegemony to pave the way for expansionist objectives. In recent years, the U.S. average annual military budget has exceeded 700 billion U.S. dollars, accounting for 40 percent of the world’s total, more than the 15 countries behind it combined. The United States has about 800 overseas military bases, with 173,000 troops deployed in 159 countries.

According to the book “America Invades: How We’ve Invaded or been Militarily Involved with almost Every Country on Earth,” the United States has fought or been militarily involved with almost all the 190-odd countries recognized by the United Nations with only three exceptions. Three countries were “spared” because the United States did not find them on the map.

◆ As former U.S. President Jimmy Carter put it, the United States is undoubtedly the most warlike nation in the history of the world. According to a Tufts University report, “Introducing the Military Intervention Project: A new Dataset on U.S. Military Interventions, 1776-2019,” the United States undertook nearly 400 military interventions globally between those years, 34 percent of which were in Latin America and the Caribbean, 23 percent in East Asia and the Pacific, 14 percent in the Middle East and North Africa, and 13 percent in Europe. Currently, its military intervention in the Middle East and North Africa and sub-Saharan Africa is on the rise.

Alex Lo, a South China Morning Post columnist, pointed out that the United States has rarely distinguished between diplomacy and war since its founding. It overthrew democratically elected governments in many developing countries in the 20th century and immediately replaced them with pro-American puppet regimes. Today, in Ukraine, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Pakistan and Yemen, the United States is repeating its old tactics of waging proxy, low-intensity, and drone wars.

◆ U.S. military hegemony has caused humanitarian tragedies. Since 2001, the wars and military operations launched by the United States in the name of fighting terrorism have claimed over 900,000 lives with some 335,000 of them civilians, injured millions and displaced tens of millions. The 2003 Iraq War resulted in some 200,000 to 250,000 civilian deaths, including over 16,000 directly killed by the U.S. military, and left more than a million homeless.

The United States has created 37 million refugees around the world. Since 2012, the number of Syrian refugees alone has increased tenfold. Between 2016 and 2019, 33,584 civilian deaths were documented in the Syrian fightings, including 3,833 killed by U.S.-led coalition bombings, half of them women and children. The Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) reported on 9 November 2018 that the air strikes launched by U.S. forces on Raqqa alone killed 1,600 Syrian civilians.

The two-decades-long war in Afghanistan devastated the country. A total of 47,000 Afghan civilians and 66,000 to 69,000 Afghan soldiers and police officers unrelated to the September 11 attacks were killed in U.S. military operations, and more than 10 million people were displaced. The war in Afghanistan destroyed the foundation of economic development there and plunged the Afghan people into destitution. After the “Kabul debacle” in 2021, the United States announced that it would freeze some 9.5 billion dollars in assets belonging to the Afghan central bank, a move considered as “pure looting.”

In September 2022, Turkish Interior Minister Suleyman Soylu commented at a rally that the United States has waged a proxy war in Syria, turned Afghanistan into an opium field and heroin factory, thrown Pakistan into turmoil, and left Libya in incessant civil unrest. The United States does whatever it takes to rob and enslave the people of any country with underground resources.

The United States has also adopted appalling methods in war. During the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the Kosovo War, the War in Afghanistan and the Iraq War, the United States used massive quantities of chemical and biological weapons as well as cluster bombs, fuel-air bombs, graphite bombs and depleted uranium bombs, causing enormous damage on civilian facilities, countless civilian casualties and lasting environmental pollution.

III. Economic Hegemony — Looting and Exploitation

After World War II, the United States led efforts to set up the Bretton Woods System, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, which, together with the Marshall Plan, formed the international monetary system centered around the U.S. dollar. In addition, the United States has also established institutional hegemony in the international economic and financial sector by manipulating the weighted voting systems, rules and arrangements of international organizations, including “approval by 85 percent majority,” and its domestic trade laws and regulations. By taking advantage of the dollar’s status as the major international reserve currency, the United States is basically collecting “seigniorage” from around the world; and using its control over international organizations, it coerces other countries into serving America’s political and economic strategy.

◆ The United States exploits the world’s wealth with the help of “seigniorage.” It costs only about 17 cents to produce a 100 dollar bill, but other countries had to pony up 100 dollars of actual goods in order to obtain one. It was pointed out more than half a century ago, that the United States enjoyed exorbitant privilege and deficit without tears created by its dollar, and used the worthless paper note to plunder the resources and factories of other nations.

◆ The hegemony of the U.S. dollar is the main source of instability and uncertainty in the world economy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States abused its global financial hegemony and injected trillions of dollars into the global market, leaving other countries, especially emerging economies, to pay the price. In 2022, the Fed ended its ultra-easy monetary policy and turned to aggressive interest rate hikes, causing turmoil in the international financial market and substantial depreciation of other currencies, such as the Euro, many of which dropped to a 20-year low. As a result, a large number of developing countries were challenged by high inflation, currency depreciation, and capital outflows. This was exactly what Nixon’s secretary of the treasury John Connally once remarked, with self-satisfaction yet sharp precision, that “the dollar is our currency, but it is your problem.”

◆ With its control over international economic and financial organizations, the United States imposes additional conditions to their assistance to other countries. In order to reduce obstacles to U.S. capital inflow and speculation, the recipient countries are required to advance financial liberalization and open up financial markets so that their economic policies would fall in line with America’s strategy. According to the Review of International Political Economy, along with the 1,550 debt relief programs extended by the IMF to its 131 member countries from 1985 to 2014, as many as 55,465 additional political conditions had been attached.

◆ The United States willfully suppresses its opponents with economic coercion. In the 1980s, to eliminate the economic threat posed by Japan, and to control and use the latter in service of America’s strategic goal of confronting the Soviet Union and dominating the world, the United States leveraged its hegemonic financial power against Japan, and concluded the Plaza Accord. As a result, Yen was pushed up, and Japan was pressed to open up its financial market and reform its financial system. The Plaza Accord dealt a heavy blow to the growth momentum of the Japanese economy, leaving Japan to what was later called “three lost decades.”

◆ America’s economic and financial hegemony has become a geopolitical weapon. Doubling down on unilateral sanctions and “long-arm jurisdiction,” the United States has enacted such domestic laws as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, and the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act, and introduced a series of executive orders to sanction specific countries, organizations or individuals. Statistics show that U.S. sanctions against foreign entities increased by 933 percent from 2000 to 2021. The Trump administration alone has imposed more than 3,900 sanctions, which means three sanctions per day. So far, the United States had or has imposed economic sanctions on nearly 40 countries across the world, including Cuba, China, Russia, the DPRK, Iran and Venezuela, affecting nearly half of the world’s population. “The United States of America” has turned itself into “the United States of Sanctions.” And “long-arm jurisdiction” has been reduced to nothing but a tool for the United States to use its means of state power to suppress economic competitors and interfere in normal international business. This is a serious departure from the principles of liberal market economy that the United States has long boasted.

IV. Technological Hegemony — Monopoly and Suppression

The United States seeks to deter other countries’ scientific, technological and economic development by wielding monopoly power, suppression measures and technology restrictions in high-tech fields.

◆ The United States monopolizes intellectual property in the name of protection. Taking advantage of the weak position of other countries, especially developing ones, on intellectual property rights and the institutional vacancy in relevant fields, the United States reaps excessive profits through monopoly. In 1994, the United States pushed forward the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), forcing the Americanized process and standards in intellectual property protection in an attempt to solidify its monopoly on technology.

In the 1980s, to contain the development of Japan’s semiconductor industry, the United States launched the “301” investigation, built bargaining power in bilateral negotiations through multilateral agreements, threatened to label Japan as conducting unfair trade, and imposed retaliatory tariffs, forcing Japan to sign the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. As a result, Japanese semiconductor enterprises were almost completely driven out of global competition, and their market share dropped from 50 percent to 10 percent. Meanwhile, with the support of the U.S. government, a large number of U.S. semiconductor enterprises took the opportunity and grabbed larger market share.

◆ The United States politicizes, weaponizes technological issues and uses them as ideological tools. Overstretching the concept of national security, the United States mobilized state power to suppress and sanction Chinese company Huawei, restricted the entry of Huawei products into the U.S. market, cut off its supply of chips and operating systems, and coerced other countries to ban Huawei from undertaking local 5G network construction. It even talked Canada into unwarrantedly detaining Huawei’s CFO Meng Wanzhou for nearly three years.

The United States has fabricated a slew of excuses to clamp down on China’s high-tech enterprises with global competitiveness, and has put more than 1,000 Chinese enterprises on sanction lists. In addition, the United States has also imposed controls on biotechnology, artificial intelligence and other high-end technologies, reinforced export restrictions, tightened investment screening, suppressed Chinese social media apps such as TikTok and WeChat, and lobbied the Netherlands and Japan to restrict exports of chips and related equipment or technology to China.

The United States has also practiced double standards in its policy on China-related technological professionals. To sideline and suppress Chinese researchers, since June 2018, visa validity has been shortened for Chinese students majoring in certain high-tech-related disciplines, repeated cases have occurred where Chinese scholars and students going to the United States for exchange programs and study were unjustifiably denied and harassed, and large-scale investigation on Chinese scholars working in the United States was carried out.

◆ The United States solidifies its technological monopoly in the name of protecting democracy. By building small blocs on technology such as the “chips alliance” and “clean network,” the United States has put “democracy” and “human rights” labels on high-technology, and turned technological issues into political and ideological issues, so as to fabricate excuses for its technological blockade against other countries. In May 2019, the United States enlisted 32 countries to the Prague 5G Security Conference in the Czech Republic and issued the Prague Proposal in an attempt to exclude China’s 5G products. In April 2020, then U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced the “5G clean path,” a plan designed to build technological alliance in the 5G field with partners bonded by their shared ideology on democracy and the need to protect “cyber security.” The measures, in essence, are the U.S. attempts to maintain its technological hegemony through technological alliances.

◆ The United States abuses its technological hegemony by carrying out cyber attacks and eavesdropping. The United States has long been notorious as an “empire of hackers,” blamed for its rampant acts of cyber theft around the world. It has all kinds of means to enforce pervasive cyber attacks and surveillance, including using analog base station signals to access mobile phones for data theft, manipulating mobile apps, infiltrating cloud servers, and stealing through undersea cables. The list goes on.

U.S. surveillance is indiscriminate. All can be targets of its surveillance, be they rivals or allies, even leaders of allied countries such as former German Chancellor Angela Merkel and several French Presidents. Cyber surveillance and attacks launched by the United States such as “Prism,” “Dirtbox,” “Irritant Horn” and “Telescreen Operation” are all proof that the United States is closely monitoring its allies and partners. Such eavesdropping on allies and partners has already caused worldwide outrage. Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, a website that has exposed U.S. surveillance programs, said that “do not expect a global surveillance superpower to act with honor or respect. There is only one rule: there are no rules.”

V. Cultural Hegemony — Spreading False Narratives

The global expansion of American culture is an important part of its external strategy. The United States has often used cultural tools to strengthen and maintain its hegemony in the world.

◆ The United States embeds American values in its products such as movies. American values and lifestyle are a tied product to its movies and TV shows, publications, media content, and programs by the government-funded non-profit cultural institutions. It thus shapes a cultural and public opinion space in which American culture reigns and maintains cultural hegemony. In his article The Americanization of the World, John Yemma, an American scholar, exposed the real weapons in U.S. cultural expansion: the Hollywood, the image design factories on Madison Avenue and the production lines of Mattel Company and Coca-Cola.

There are various vehicles the United States uses to keep its cultural hegemony. American movies are the most used; they now occupy more than 70 percent of the world’s market share. The United States skilfully exploits its cultural diversity to appeal to various ethnicities. When Hollywood movies descend on the world, they scream the American values tied to them.

◆ American cultural hegemony not only shows itself in “direct intervention,” but also in “media infiltration” and as “a trumpet for the world.” U.S.-dominated Western media has a particularly important role in shaping global public opinion in favor of U.S. meddling in the internal affairs of other countries.

The U.S. government strictly censors all social media companies and demands their obedience. Twitter CEO Elon Musk admitted on 27 December 2022 that all social media platforms work with the U.S. government to censor content, reported Fox Business Network. Public opinion in the United States is subject to government intervention to restrict all unfavorable remarks. Google often makes pages disappear.

U.S. Department of Defense manipulates social media. In December 2022, The Intercept, an independent U.S. investigative website, revealed that in July 2017, U.S. Central Command official Nathaniel Kahler instructed Twitter’s public policy team to augment the presence of 52 Arabic-language accounts on a list he sent, six of which were to be given priority. One of the six was dedicated to justifying U.S. drone attacks in Yemen, such as by claiming that the attacks were precise and killed only terrorists, not civilians. Following Kahler’s directive, Twitter put those Arabic-language accounts on a “white list” to amplify certain messages.

◆The United States practices double standards on the freedom of the press. It brutally suppresses and silences media of other countries by various means. The United States and Europe bar mainstream Russian media such as Russia Today and the Sputnik from their countries. Platforms such as Twitter, Facebook and YouTube openly restrict official accounts of Russia. Netflix, Apple and Google have removed Russian channels and applications from their services and app stores. Unprecedented draconian censorship is imposed on Russia-related contents.

◆The United States abuses its cultural hegemony to instigate “peaceful evolution” in socialist countries. It sets up news media and cultural outfits targeting socialist countries. It pours staggering amounts of public funds into radio and TV networks to support their ideological infiltration, and these mouthpieces bombard socialist countries in dozens of languages with inflammatory propaganda day and night.

The United States uses misinformation as a spear to attack other countries, and has built an industrial chain around it: there are groups and individuals making up stories, and peddling them worldwide to mislead public opinion with the support of nearly limitless financial resources.

Conclusion

While a just cause wins its champion wide support, an unjust one condemns its pursuer to be an outcast. The hegemonic, domineering, and bullying practices of using strength to intimidate the weak, taking from others by force and subterfuge, and playing zero-sum games are exerting grave harm. The historical trends of peace, development, cooperation, and mutual benefit are unstoppable. The United States has been overriding truth with its power and trampling justice to serve self-interest. These unilateral, egoistic and regressive hegemonic practices have drawn growing, intense criticism and opposition from the international community.

Countries need to respect each other and treat each other as equals. Big countries should behave in a manner befitting their status and take the lead in pursuing a new model of state-to-state relations featuring dialogue and partnership, not confrontation or alliance. China opposes all forms of hegemonism and power politics, and rejects interference in other countries’ internal affairs. The United States must conduct serious soul-searching. It must critically examine what it has done, let go of its arrogance and prejudice, and quit its hegemonic, domineering and bullying practices.

Strugglelalucha256


La dirigente cubana Mariela Castro Espín habla de la “conquista progresiva de nuevos derechos”

Mensaje en vídeo de Mariela Castro Espín, directora del Centro Nacional de Educación Sexual (CENESEX) de Cuba y diputada de la Asamblea Nacional del Poder Popular, al seminario web “Lo que podemos aprender del “Código de Libertad” de Cuba para las familias”, organizado por Mujeres en Lucha/Mujeres En Lucha el 22 de enero.

Hola compañeras, reciban un saludo cordial, soy Mariela Castro.

Quiero comentarles que hay dos hitos principales en la revolución cubana respecto al derecho familiar. Uno fue el código de familia aprobado en 1975, que además fue un proceso también de consulta popular y se llevó a referéndum. Un código que además permitió instituir ya valores importantes que se estaban promocionando en la sociedad cubana para la igualdad de derechos entre los hombres y las mujeres, sobre todo en la vida familiar, en la distribución equitativa de las tareas educativas, de las tareas del hogar. Un poco para empezar a erosionar esa herencia patriarcal de la división sexual del trabajo.

Ese código jugó un papel muy importante. Se consideró uno de los más avanzados del mundo en esa época. Un código heteropatriarcal todavía en algunos aspectos y hetero normativos específicamente. Pero ya a la sociedad cubana no se le podía pedir mucho más en esa etapa.

El trabajo de educación, el desarrollo científico, sobre todo en el campo de las ciencias jurídicas, de las ciencias sociales y humanísticas, llevaron a que también la sociedad cubana adquiriera una cultura mucho más sólida en el campo de la familia y en el campo del derecho familiar. Pero también todo lo que se avanzó respecto a los derechos de las mujeres y todo lo que incluso se refleja a nivel estadístico, porque Cuba tiene el segundo lugar a nivel mundial de mujeres parlamentarias: el 53% del parlamento cubano está integrado por mujeres. Nuestra Asamblea Nacional de Poder Popular, en niveles de dirección hay cada vez más presencia de mujeres. En el campo científico cubano predominan las mujeres, y hay varios sectores de la sociedad cubana a nivel profesional donde la presencia de las mujeres cada vez más alta.

Así que en Cuba hay un respeto por las mujeres; pero todavía, el patriarcado, aunque ha sido erosionado y debilitado por los avances de nuestra Revolución, realmente todavía hace resistencias importantes y eso nos genera desafíos.

Después de 47 años de vigencia del Código de familia y todos los elementos nuevos que se fueron incorporando, las leyes en las que Cuba se suscribía y se comprometía como estado, leyes en el campo del derecho internacional, en el campo de los Derechos Humanos, todo lo que iba avanzando nuestra Revolución, ya era necesario actualizar ese código.

Pero se empezó por la reforma primero, de la estrategia de desarrollo económico y social del país con la participación del pueblo con sus criterios, con sus críticas y sus propuestas. De ahí se pasó a la reforma constitucional que fue una reforma sustancial de 2019 aprobada en abril de 2019, también sometida a consulta especializada, consulta popular y llevada referéndum con una participación altísima. El 87% de la población aprobó esa constitución en la que ya se blindaban los derechos de las personas LGBT, se abrían caminos importantes por ejemplo, para lo que le llaman el matrimonio igualitario, pero también para fortalecer la mayor protección a la salud sexual y reproductiva, los derechos sexuales y reproductivos.

Hay muchos otros elementos que ustedes podrán leer en este documento tan valioso que hay quienes consideran el más avanzado del mundo. Expertos internacionales lo consideran así. Pero además, un código que al igual que la Constitución, fue escrito con el corazón, con la inteligencia y la sabiduría de nuestro pueblo.

Se le llama también el Código de los Afectos porque se ponderan los vínculos afectivos por encima de esa camisa de fuerza que existía de los vínculos biológicos.

Realmente esto tiene un significado muy grande porque a pesar de la oposición de algunos grupos religiosos y particularmente la Iglesia Católica a evitar los avances de la Revolución en la conquista progresiva de nuevos derechos, realmente se logró con la participación de nuestro pueblo, llegar a un código ampliamente aceptado aunque fue el primero que en el que hubo un 33% de votos negativos. Pero está bien, eso demuestra la resistencia que todavía existe en relación con estos temas, y todos los desafíos que nos generan para seguir transformando las conciencias, que nos permitan generar una ciudadanía activa con relación a las necesidades de transformaciones sociales y transformaciones subjetivas para hacer una sociedad cada vez más justa y equitativa.

El proceso de transición al socialismo es complejo y las conciencias siempre avanzan de manera más rezagada. Y esto es lo que ha estado sucediendo. Ese es el significado que tiene. Nuestro pueblo aprobó una constitución y un código de las familias muy avanzado dentro del contexto de sociedad socialista de derechos y Justicia social.

Me siento muy satisfecha con el resultado, pero también siento la responsabilidad que todavía tenemos de seguir avanzando para educar y comunicar de manera permanente todos los elementos basados en la ciencia que ayuden a aportar elementos de análisis para monitorear y evaluar cómo va la aplicación de esta nueva legislación en la regulación del derecho familiar.

Muchas gracias por su interés en el tema. Les invito a leer este documento tan valioso que ha sido el resultado de la construcción de consensos durante los 47 años que duró el código anterior. Y esa es la importancia que tiene., cómo nuestra sociedad está avanzando en la adquisición de conciencia y de una cultura mucho más rigurosa con relación a los temas que este código trata.

Muchas gracias por su interés y reciban un afectuoso saludo; hasta la próxima.

Strugglelalucha256
https://www.struggle-la-lucha.org/author/strugglelalucha_im4mi5/page/37/