Trump deploys warships toward Iran to enforce sanctions

Aircraftcarrier
The aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln sails through the Strait of Hormuz in 2019 with Britain’s HMS Defender and the U.S. destroyer USS Farragut. The narrow waterway is one of the world’s most important oil-shipping routes. Photo: US Navy

Donald Trump has issued a direct threat of all-out war against the Islamic Republic of Iran, while ordering a naval armada into the Persian Gulf and Arabian Sea.

This is not a policy shift or a strategic recalibration. It follows four decades of sanctions, proxy war, and military buildup that have failed to break Iran’s economy or its government.

The pretext, as always, is paper-thin and reeks of hypocrisy. Pointing to internal protests within Iran — protests born from an economic crisis engineered in Washington — Trump postured as a liberator, declaring the U.S. “locked and loaded and ready to go” to “rescue” the Iranian people. 

It takes quite the imagination to cast the world’s foremost expert in domestic militarized police violence as a humanitarian savior. This is the same federal government whose masked paramilitary agents have beaten and shot protesters in the streets of Minneapolis.

Even so, the imperialists still have the nerve to appoint themselves the arbiter of protest rights in a sovereign nation 7,000 miles away. The offer is a sick joke, a cynical ploy to weaponize the suffering its own sanctions created.

For decades, the United States has waged relentless economic warfare against Iran through a sanctions regime designed not for diplomacy, but for collective punishment. This is a policy of deliberate strangulation, targeting oil exports through insurance bans, cutting banks off from international payment systems, and seizing tankers to deter third-country trade. The goal of this assault is to make the country ungovernable, to turn population against state, and to either force a return to client status or reduce a historic civilization to a failed state. 

The armada steaming toward West Asia is not a defensive measure. It is the sharp end of the economic spear, the logical culmination of a 40-year campaign to break Iranian sovereignty. Recall that just last year, U.S. and Israeli bombers launched a coordinated, 12-day assault on Iranian nuclear facilities, killing thousands of civilians and Iranian military personnel.  When officials like Mike Huckabee lament that Iran “didn’t get the full message,” and Trump promises consequences “maybe more powerful than the last time,” they are describing a deliberate campaign of terror meant to bomb a nation into submission.

That intent is, and has always been, about control. The official litany of concerns — nuclear programs, regional militias, human rights — is merely a convenient pretext. The fundamental crime of the Islamic Republic, in the eyes of Washington, was its 1979 revolution that overthrew the U.S.-installed dictator and forever ended Iran’s status as an U.S. client state. 

Its enduring sin is its continued sovereignty: its trade with U.S.-sanctioned nations, its support for resistance movements across the region, and, most critically, its pivotal geographic role in the emerging multi-polar world. Iran sits at the heart of China’s Belt and Road Initiative and Russia’s International North-South Transport Corridor — infrastructure projects that promise trade routes and financial systems outside of Wall Street’s and the Pentagon’s control. An Iran that is strong, stable, and integrated into these alternative frameworks weakens U.S. control over energy routes, financial clearing systems, and regional transport infrastructure.

Trump’s threats and the movement of his armada are a response to the failure of sanctions and regional proxy wars to produce regime change.

Faced with a nation that has resisted four decades of pressure and is now deepening its alliances with other major powers resisting U.S. diktats, the empire is reaching for the only tool it has left: overt, unilateral aggression. The danger is catastrophic. A full-scale war would kill millions, devastate the global economy, and risk a confrontation that could spiral beyond any control. But for a ruling class addicted to profits at all costs and facing the inexorable erosion of its unipolar moment, even this risk is preferable to accepting a world it does not command.

The lie is transparent. This has nothing to do with freedom, security, or the rights of protesters. It is the old, blood-soaked logic of empire: If a nation cannot be controlled, it must be broken. The warships are not sailing to save anyone. The warships are there to protect shipping lanes, energy markets, and U.S. financial dominance — and to signal that any country attempting to build outside those structures risks being met with force.


Join the Struggle-La Lucha Telegram channel